For the reasons stated in State v. Bowditch, — N.C. —, — S.E.2d —, slip op. (Oct. 8, 2010) (No. 448PA09), the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
State v. Morrow, 364 N.C. 424 (2010)
Oct. 8, 2010
·
Supreme Court of North Carolina
·
No. 461A09
364 N.C. 424
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JOSEPH DWAYNE MORROW
No. 461A09
(Filed 8 October 2010)
Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 200 N.C. App. —, 683 S.E.2d 754 (2009), finding defendant’s constitutional challenge to an order entered on 19 February 2008 by Judge Henry E. Frye, Jr. in Superior Court, Wilkes County, without merit but remanding for additional findings of fact and a determination of the duration of defendant’s enrollment in satellite-based monitoring. Heard in the Supreme Court 17 February 2010. .
Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Peter A. Regulski, Assistant Attorney General, for the State.
Mark Montgomery for defendant-appellant.
dissent for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion in State v. Bowditch, —N.C. —, — S.E.2d — (Oct. 8, 2010) (No. 448PA09).